Fast, accurate, and reliable molecular docking with QuickVina 2

197Citations
Citations of this article
195Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: The need for efficient molecular docking tools for high-throughput screening is growing alongside the rapid growth of drug-fragment databases. AutoDock Vina ('Vina') is a widely used docking tool with parallelization for speed. QuickVina ('QVina 1') then further enhanced the speed via a heuristics, requiring high exhaustiveness. With low exhaustiveness, its accuracy was compromised. We present in this article the latest version of QuickVina ('QVina 2') that inherits both the speed of QVina 1 and the reliability of the original Vina. Results: We tested the efficacy of QVina 2 on the core set of PDBbind 2014. With the default exhaustiveness level of Vina (i.e. 8), a maximum of 20.49-fold and an average of 2.30-fold acceleration with a correlation coefficient of 0.967 for the first mode and 0.911 for the sum of all modes were attained over the original Vina. A tendency for higher acceleration with increased number of rotatable bonds as the design variables was observed. On the accuracy, Vina wins over QVina 2 on 30% of the data with average energy difference of only 0.58∈kcal/mol. On the same dataset, GOLD produced RMSD smaller than 2∈Å on 56.9% of the data while QVina 2 attained 63.1%. Availability and implementation: The C++ source code of QVina 2 is available at (www.qvina.org).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alhossary, A., Handoko, S. D., Mu, Y., & Kwoh, C. K. (2015). Fast, accurate, and reliable molecular docking with QuickVina 2. Bioinformatics, 31(13), 2214–2216. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free