Talk Ain't Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation

64Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Deliberative democratic theory, commonly used to explore questions of political corporate social responsibility (PCSR), has become prominent in the literature. This theory has been challenged previously for being overly sanguine about firm profit imperatives, but left unexamined is whether corporate contexts are appropriate contexts for deliberative theory in the first place. We explore this question using the case of Starbucks' Race Together campaign to show that significant challenges exist to corporate deliberation, even in cases featuring genuinely committed firms. We return to the underlying social theory to show that this is not an isolated case: for-profit firms are predictably hostile contexts for deliberation, and significant normative and strategic problems can be expected should deliberative theory be imported uncritically to corporate contexts. We close with recent advances in deliberative democratic theory that might help update the PCSR project, and accommodate the application of deliberation to the corporate context, albeit with significant alterations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sabadoz, C., & Singer, A. (2017). Talk Ain’t Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.73

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free