Sentence level or token level features for automatic short answer grading?: use both

55Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Automatic short answer grading for Intelligent Tutoring Systems has attracted much attention of the researchers over the years. While the traditional techniques for short answer grading are rooted in statistical learning and hand-crafted features, recent research has explored sentence embedding based techniques. We observe that sentence embedding techniques, while being effective for grading in-domain student answers, may not be best suited for out-of-domain answers. Further, sentence embeddings can be affected by non-sentential answers (answers given in the context of the question). On the other hand, token level hand-crafted features can be fairly domain independent and are less affected by non-sentential forms. We propose a novel feature encoding based on partial similarities of tokens (Histogram of Partial Similarities or HoPS), its extension to part-of-speech tags (HoPSTags) and question type information. On combining the proposed features with sentence embedding based features, we are able to further improve the grading performance. Our final model achieves better or competitive results in experimental evaluation on multiple benchmarking datasets and a large scale industry dataset.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saha, S., Dhamecha, T. I., Marvaniya, S., Sindhgatta, R., & Sengupta, B. (2018). Sentence level or token level features for automatic short answer grading?: use both. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10947 LNAI, pp. 503–517). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free