Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy. The moderning influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity

123Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Past demonstrations of sex differences in jealousy have generally employed Buss et al.'s [Psychol. Sci. 3 (1992) 251] forced-choice methodology, a limitation criticized by DeSteno and Salovey Psychol. Sci. 7 (1996) 367]. The present studies address this criticism by demonstrating the sex difference using both forced-choice and continuous measures of jealousy. In addition, the results distinguish two important moderators of the sex difference: infidelity experience, in which male victims and female perpetrators of infidelity reported greater distress in response to a sexual infidelity, and sexual orientation of the infidelity, in which the sex difference disappears completely when infidelity carries no risk of conception because an opposite-sex partner has become involved with a same-sex lover. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sagarin, B. J., Vaughn Becker, D., Guadagno, R. E., Nicastle, L. D., & Millevoi, A. (2003). Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy. The moderning influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00106-X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free