Commons Organizing: Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics

43Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In recent years, business ethics and economic scholars have been paying greater attention to the development of commons organizing. The latter refers to the processes by which communities of people work in common in the pursuit of the common good. In turn, this promotes commons organizational designs based on collective forms of common goods production, distribution, management and ownership. In this paper, we build on two main literature streams: (1) the ethical approach based on the theory of the common good of the firm in virtue ethics and (2) the economic approach based on the theory of institutions for collective action developed by Ostrom’s research on common-pool resources to avert the tragedy of the commons. The latter expands to include the novel concepts of new commons, “commoning” and polycentric governance. Drawing on the analysis of what is new in these forms of organizing, we propose a comprehensive model, highlighting the integration of two sets of organizing principles—common good and collective action – and five problem-solving processes to explain the main dimensions of commons organizing. We contribute to business ethics literature by exploring the convergence between the ethical and economic approaches in the development of a commons organizing view.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Albareda, L., & Sison, A. J. G. (2020). Commons Organizing: Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(4), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04580-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free