Nonconsensual Dose Reduction Mandates are Not Justified Clinically or Ethically: An Analysis

8Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This manuscript describes the institutional and clinical considerations that apply to the question of whether to mandate opioid dose reduction in patients who have received opioids long-term. It describes how a calamitous rise in addiction and overdose involving opioids has both led to a clinical recalibration by healthcare providers, and to strong incentives favoring forcible opioid reduction by policy making agencies. Neither the 2016 Guideline issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nor clinical evidence can justify or promote such policies as safe or effective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kertesz, S. G., Manhapra, A., & Gordon, A. J. (2020). Nonconsensual Dose Reduction Mandates are Not Justified Clinically or Ethically: An Analysis. In Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics (Vol. 48, pp. 259–267). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520935337

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free