Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools

31Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost) and a latex agglutination test (Rotalex). Specimens were collected from 112 children with diarrhoea. The relative sensitivities of the different assays for human rotavirus were as follows: electron microscopy, 84%; immunofluorescence, 86%; Rotalex, 88%; Rotazyme, 89%; immune electron microscopy, 93%; Enzygnost, 98%. According to our findings Enzygnost is the most sensitive method, but Rotalex is more valuable for screening a small number of faecal samples. No false-positive results were observed in the two enzyme immunoassays or in Rotalex. © 1984 Vieweg Publishing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morinet, F., Ferchal, F., Colimon, R., & Pérol, Y. (1984). Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 3(2), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014331

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free