Towards a post-foundational geography: Spaces of negativity, contingency, and antagonism

30Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The relation between politics, ontology, and space remains one of the most contested concerns in human geography, often leading to a dismissal of ontology in favor of the politicization of space. In contrast, this article mobilizes post-foundationalism to propose a political ontology of space. After reviewing geographers’ engagements with politics, post-politics and the political, the article demonstrates how a post-foundational geography radically uproots geographic understandings of political and socio-spatial realities. Grounded upon parameters of negativity, contingency, and antagonism, the article equips geographers to grapple with the crumbling foundations of an uncertain present, and unknown futures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Landau-Donnelly, F., & Pohl, L. (2023). Towards a post-foundational geography: Spaces of negativity, contingency, and antagonism. Progress in Human Geography, 47(4), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325231156928

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free