Authentic language tests: Where from and where to?

20Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the first part of the paper the development of language tests towards authenticity is surveyed. The advantages and shortcomings of indirect vs direct (authentic) types are analysed. Whereas indirect tests were more efficient and lent themselves to psychometric analyses, they did not tap real-life language. On the other hand, direct tests based on real interactions aim at capturing real language and its variations in use. In the second part of the paper two problems involved in authentic tests are addressed: a) The difficulty of applying appropriate psychometric measures, caused by the complexity of tapping the whole construct of authentic language, and b) the large number of ‘test’ variables which interfere with the authenticity of the language produced and reduce it to authentic ‘test language’. © 1985, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shohamy, E., & Reves, T. (1985). Authentic language tests: Where from and where to? Language Testing, 2(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free