Complication patterns and postoperative outcomes in surgical patients admitted to intensive care units

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the frequency and types of postoperative complications and risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study included adult patients who underwent surgical procedures and were admitted to the intensive care unit of a university hospital between March and July 2022. Study variables included sociodemographic, clinical, and epidemiological data; postoperative complications and hospital outcomes. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: We analyzed 202 patients, with a median age of 67 years (IQR 55-74) and a predominance of males (62.4%). Inhospital mortality was 26.2%. Postoperative complications occurred in 84.7% of patients, with cardiovascular (53.4%), infectious (49.5%), and gastrointestinal (48.5%) complications being the most frequent. Early postoperative feeding was initiated in 34.2% of cases, and a delay was associated with a higher risk of complications. Nausea and vomiting prophylaxis were administered to most patients - intraoperatively in 61.9% and postoperatively in 96%. In logistic regression analysis, female sex, urgent surgery, and higher SAPS 3 scores were identified as independent risk factors for death. Conclusions: Postoperative complications were highly prevalent and associated with an increased risk of death. Intra-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis and early postoperative feeding were associated with a lower frequency of complications. Identified risk factors for mortality included female sex, higher SAPS 3 scores, and urgent surgeries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanches, C. T., Ribeiro Albanese, S. P., Elen Robuste, M., Gomes Da Silva, G., Tanita, M. T., & Grion, C. (2025). Complication patterns and postoperative outcomes in surgical patients admitted to intensive care units. Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 11(4), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free