Rapid hypoxia preconditioning protects cortical neurons from glutamate toxicity through δ-opioid receptor

102Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose - Hypoxia preconditioning (HPC), rapid or delayed, has been reported to induce neuroprotection against subsequent severe stress. Because δ-opioid receptor (DOR) plays an important role in delayed HPC-induced neuroprotection against severe hypoxic injury, we asked whether DOR is also involved in the rapid HPC-induced neuroprotection. Methods - Cultured rat cortical neurons at culture days 8 to 9 were exposed to a short-term hypoxia (1% O2 for 30 minutes) to induce HPC followed by 30-minute normoxia before exposing to glutamate toxicity (100 μmol/L; 4 hours). Neuronal viability was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase leakage and morphological assessment. Protein and mRNA levels of DOR were detected by receptor binding and RT-PCR, respectively. Naltrindole was used to block DOR. Developmental changes in NMDA receptor expression was measured by Western blots. Results - HPC significantly reduced the glutamate-induced neuronal injury. Receptor binding showed that HPC increased DADLE (a DOR ligand) binding density in the cultured cortical neurons by >90% over control level (P<0.05), although RT-PCR did not detect any appreciable change in DOR mRNA. DOR inhibition with naltrindole had no effect on neuronal injury and completely abolished the HPC-induced neuroprotection. In contrast to HPC-induced increase in DADLE binding density, prolonged hypoxia caused severe neuronal injury with a significant decrease in DADLE binding density and DOR mRNA level. Conclusions - DOR is involved in neuroprotection induced by rapid HPC in cortical neurons. © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, J., Qian, H., Zhao, P., Hong, S. S., & Xia, Y. (2006). Rapid hypoxia preconditioning protects cortical neurons from glutamate toxicity through δ-opioid receptor. Stroke, 37(4), 1094–1099. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000206444.29930.18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free