The flip side of collaborative alliance: A single-case study

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present single case study explored whether a positive collaboration may conceal some of the patient’s dysfunctional interpersonal schemas, hence reflecting a non-authentic collaboration. In particular, we reasoned that conceiving collaborations only as adaptive relations may prevent a comprehensive insight of the therapeutic relationship itself. To explore this possibility, we used an intersubjective approach that emphasizes the integration of specific and non-specific factors in an interdependent way. In particular, we assessed different constructs (i.e. therapeutic alliance, technical interventions, defense mechanism, therapeutic relationship) of the therapeutic process and combined them through statistical methods able to investigate the micro- and macro-analytic processes that define each interaction. Results of a single case study (Sara) showed that the collaborative functioning may hold back many critical aspects, that hardly conciliate with the classic positive definition of collaboration. These findings, therefore, indicate that Sara’s collaborative alliance works mainly as a pseudo-alliance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Locati, F., De Carli, P., Lang, M., & Parolin, L. (2019). The flip side of collaborative alliance: A single-case study. In Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome (Vol. 22, pp. 233–243). PAGEPress Publications. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.384

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free