Using monetization to harmonize life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis for green public procurement of pavement projects

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This research applies monetization to harmonize life cycle assessment (LCA) with life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) for implementation in the green public procurement of pavement projects. The monetized environmental impact (MEI) shows an excellent correlation with the net present value. As both indicators are expressed using the same unit, LCA and LCCA can be easily combined into a single sustainability indicator. The MEI is mainly determined by the impact of the upper asphalt layers. The structure with bitumen stabilized material (BSM) and no asphalt base has the lowest MEI, followed at a certain distance by the structure with unbound and lean asphalt bases. The cement-bound section and another BSM section show the highest MEI. Finally, a detailed hotspot analysis highlighted that climate change, particulate matter formation, and use of non-renewable energy resources contributed over 90% of the total MEI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moins, B., Hernando, D., Van den bergh, W., & Audenaert, A. (2023). Using monetization to harmonize life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis for green public procurement of pavement projects. In Life-Cycle of Structures and Infrastructure Systems - Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE 2023 (pp. 4092–4099). CRC Press/Balkema. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003323020-504

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free