In vitro microleakage of six different dental materials as intraorifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth

7Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the coronal sealing ability of six different dental materials: Three MTA-based cements and three established restorative materials by in vitro dye penetration method. For in vitro infiltration experiments, seventy extracted single-rooted human teeth were used. After crowns of teeth were reduced, root canals were prepared, and filled with gutta-percha cone. Teeth were randomly divided into 6 groups with 10 teeth per group. The orifice of each tooth was prepared to 3 mm depth and filled with the following materials: (I) ProRoot WMTA; (II) EndoCem Zr; (III) Angelus White; (IV) LuxaCore; (V) Fuji II LC; and (VI) Elite. After 5,000 cycles of thermocycling between 5°C and 55°C, dye penetration of each specimen was measured. The order of less dye infiltration of coronal filling materials was: ProRoot WMTA <0.05).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, K. S., Kim, J. S., Lee, D. Y., Kim, R. J. Y., & Shin, J. H. (2015). In vitro microleakage of six different dental materials as intraorifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth. Dental Materials Journal, 34(4), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-242

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free