Silence is not Golden: The Effects of Prohibitive Voice on Customer Citizenship Behaviors

  • Lin Y
  • Liu H
  • Ngo P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This work analyzes the effects that service employee prohibitive voice behavior has on customer perceptions of the procedural justice received, and the consequent customer citizenship behaviors (CCB). Prohibitive voice expresses the service workers’ concern about existing or upcoming practices, events, or acts that may harm their service outcome. While this voice has been recognized as constructive and helpful to organizations, its roles regarding customer perceptions and CCB remain unexplored. Beginning with a brief review of the conceptual background of prohibitive voice, procedural justice and CCB, this paper proposes a model to test these relationships empirically. This study contributes to service research by applying the concept of “prohibitive voice” to service encounters. Implications for managing service encounters are also discussed herein.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, Y.-L., Liu, H.-W., & Ngo, P.-T. (2016). Silence is not Golden: The Effects of Prohibitive Voice on Customer Citizenship Behaviors. International Business Research, 9(9), 24. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v9n9p24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free