Abstract
Background: Observational real world studies are required in addition to RCTs which typically represent selected patients not reflecting everyday clinical practice. Between 2017-2020 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) receiving a newly initiated biologics therapy were consecutively enrolled into the prospective, observational RUN-CD registry from 44 IBD-experienced German centres to assess effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) with a 3 years follow-up. Here, the results on the effectiveness of the maintenance therapy over 12 months are presented as a real world evidence (RWE) comparison of UST vs anti-TNF. Method(s): After exclusion of other biologics than UST and anti-TNF and missing outcomes, the final sample consisted of 607 CD-patients. Clinical remission (HBI
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bokemeyer, B., Plachta-Danielzik, S., di Giuseppe, R., Deppe, H., Mohl, W., Teich, N., … Schreiber, S. (2022). P601 Real World Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of Ustekinumab vs anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease with Propensity Score adjustment: maintenance phase results from the prospective observational RUN-CD study. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, 16(Supplement_1), i534–i535. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.727
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.