P601 Real World Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of Ustekinumab vs anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease with Propensity Score adjustment: maintenance phase results from the prospective observational RUN-CD study

  • Bokemeyer B
  • Plachta-Danielzik S
  • di Giuseppe R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Observational real world studies are required in addition to RCTs which typically represent selected patients not reflecting everyday clinical practice. Between 2017-2020 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) receiving a newly initiated biologics therapy were consecutively enrolled into the prospective, observational RUN-CD registry from 44 IBD-experienced German centres to assess effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) with a 3 years follow-up. Here, the results on the effectiveness of the maintenance therapy over 12 months are presented as a real world evidence (RWE) comparison of UST vs anti-TNF. Method(s): After exclusion of other biologics than UST and anti-TNF and missing outcomes, the final sample consisted of 607 CD-patients. Clinical remission (HBI

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bokemeyer, B., Plachta-Danielzik, S., di Giuseppe, R., Deppe, H., Mohl, W., Teich, N., … Schreiber, S. (2022). P601 Real World Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of Ustekinumab vs anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease with Propensity Score adjustment: maintenance phase results from the prospective observational RUN-CD study. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, 16(Supplement_1), i534–i535. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.727

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free