On the relationship of value priorities with the centrality of religiosity and a variety of religious orientations and emotions

2Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between religiosity and value priorities is differentiated, based on a multidimensional model of religiosity (Structure-of-Religiosity-Test). The structure of values is conceptualized using Shalom H. Schwartz’s two orthogonal dimensions of self-transcendence vs. self-enhancement and openness to change vs. conservation. The relationship between these two dimensions and the centrality of religiosity, seven religious orientations, seven emotions toward God, and three political orientations were tested with a correlational analysis in a sample of members of Abrahamic religions, the non-denominational, and organized secularists in Switzerland (n = 1093). The results show, that different values are preferred (self-direction, universalism, benevolence, tradition, security, and power values) depending on the content of the religious orientations and emotions toward God. The results indicate the importance of the content of religious orientations and emotions for predicting value-loaded behaviors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gennerich, C., & Huber, S. (2021). On the relationship of value priorities with the centrality of religiosity and a variety of religious orientations and emotions. Religions, 12(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12030157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free