Context The Framingham Heart Study produced sex-specific coronary heart dis- ease (CHD) prediction functions for assessing risk of developing incidentCHDin a white middle-class population. Concern exists regarding whether these functions can be gen- eralized to other populations. Objective To test the validity and transportability of the Framingham CHD predic- tion functions per a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop organized for this purpose. Design, Setting, and Subjects Sex-specific CHD functions were derived from Framingham data for prediction of coronary death and myocardial infarction. These functions were applied to 6 prospectively studied, ethnically diverse cohorts (n=23424), including whites, blacks, Native Americans, Japanese American men, and Hispanic men: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (1987-1988), Physicians’ Health Study (1982), Honolulu Heart Program (1980-1982), Puerto Rico Heart Health Program (1965- 1968), Strong Heart Study (1989-1991), and Cardiovascular Health Study (1989-1990). Main Outcome Measures The performance, or ability to accurately predict CHD risk, of the Framingham functions compared with the performance of risk functions developed specifically from the individual cohorts’ data. Comparisons included evalu- ation of the equality of relative risks for standard CHD risk factors, discrimination, and calibration. Results For white men and women and for black men and women the Framingham functions performed reasonably well for prediction ofCHDevents within5years of follow- up. Among Japanese American and Hispanic men and Native American women, the Framingham functions systematically overestimated the risk of 5-yearCHDevents. After recalibration, taking into account different prevalences of risk factors and underlying rates of developing CHD, the Framingham functions worked well in these populations. Conclusions The sex-specific Framingham CHD prediction functions perform well among whites and blacks in different settings and can be applied to other ethnic groups after recalibration for differing prevalences of risk factors and underlying rates ofCHD events.
CITATION STYLE
D’Agostino, R. B., Grundy, S., Sullivan, L. M., & Wilson, P. (2001). Validation of the Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Prediction Scores. JAMA, 286(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.2.180
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.