Improving standards in clinical record-keeping

39Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Clinical records are the most basic of clinical tools. Aggregated, they form a permanent account of individual considerations and the reasons for decisions. Essential for effective communication and good clinical care, they are often accorded low priority, are poorly maintained and not readily available. Independent inquiries, health ombudsmen's reports and the courts have repeatedly criticised the quality of records and the resulting failings of care. Most advice from professional bodies, indemnity organisations and the General Medical Council is extremely brief and confined to individual entries in the record. Patient safety and the demands of clinical governance make change essential. This article draws together standards and concludes with some good practice points for a fit-for-purpose, structured, multidisciplinary record to support good care and protect the interests of patients and clinicians. These principles should be equally applicable to electronic records.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pullen, I., & Loudon, J. (2006). Improving standards in clinical record-keeping. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 12(4), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.12.4.280

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free