Quality assurance and the need to evaluate interventions and audit programme outcomes

6Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical guidelines provide standards for the provision of healthcare. However, these guidelines have been poorly implemented in daily practice. Clinical audit is a quality improvement tool to promote quality of care in daily practice and to improve outcomes through the systematic review of care delivery and implementation of changes. A major priority in the management of subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) management is secondary prevention by controlling cardiovascular risk factors and providing appropriate medical treatment. Clinical audits can be applied to monitor modifiable risk factors and evaluate quality improvements of CVD management in daily practice. Existing clinical audits have provided an overview of the burden of risk factors in subjects with CVD and reflect real-world risk factor recording and management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, M., Vaartjes, I., Klipstein-Grobusch, K., Kotseva, K., Jennings, C., Grobbee, D. E., & Graham, I. (2017). Quality assurance and the need to evaluate interventions and audit programme outcomes. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 24(3), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487317703829

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free