Comparison of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with epidural technique for labor analgesia

  • Arslantas R
  • Arslantas M
  • Ozyuvaci E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The labor pain is one of the most severe pains that a woman could ever be suffered. Today, many medical and psychological methods are used in an effort to reduce labor pain.Epidural analgesia is the best current method used for the purposes of obstetric analgesia. METHODS: The study was carried out on 60 ASA-I pregnant women whose 3 to 6 cm of cervical dilatation, treated in Health Ministry Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, within vaginal labor process. With use of patient controlled epidural analgesia method, the bupivacaine combined with low dose fentanyl were administered to 30 pregnant women (Group B). Levobupivacaine, combined with low dose fentanyl applied with the same method was administered to another 30 pregnant women (Group L). Between the two groups, the hemodynamic parameters on the mother and fetus, the course of the labor process, severity of pain, its influences on newborn and mother satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: In our study, there was no difference as to motor block development between groups, but the sensory block was monitored less in group L at the minutes 15, 30, 45 and 90. Furthermore, the 5 minutes pain score was found lower in group L. The VAS values at the other times were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, with the usage of 0.125% bupivacaine or 0.125% levobupivacaine, sufficient labor analgesia is achieved with patient controlled epidural analgesia method at the same side effect frequency. Consequently, both local analgesic medicines are seemed to be safely used in labor analgesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arslantas, R., Arslantas, M. K., & Ozyuvaci, E. (2012). Comparison of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with epidural technique for labor analgesia. Ağrı - The Journal of The Turkish Society of Algology, 24(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.5505/agri.2012.82584

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free