Systems Biology Modeling Practices: Reflections of a Philosopher-Ethnographer

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

“The nature of the problems being formulated and addressed by systems biology creates interdependence among researchers in engineering, applied mathematics, computing, and biosciences. In this context, the prefix “trans” signifies that this enterprise seeps into, penetrates, specific prior practices of the mother fields and opens an emergent problem space with multiple possibilities for interaction and integration. I have characterized the problem space of systems biology as an adaptive problem space in that, as with the systems it investigates, adaptation of the researchers is a process of continually revising and reconfiguring knowledge, methods, and so forth as they learn and gain experience. Research in adaptive problem spaces is driven by complex interdisciplinary problems, and these require that the individuals themselves achieve a measure of hybridization in methods, concepts, models, materials – in how they think and how they act.”.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nersessian, N. J. (2017). Systems Biology Modeling Practices: Reflections of a Philosopher-Ethnographer. In History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences (Vol. 20, pp. 215–225). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47000-9_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free