Abstract
An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms.Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcinoma (94.0% compared with 58.0%), the greatest difference in sensitivity between the two tests being for rectal cancers. Similarly Hemeselect was more sensitive than Haemoccult for colorectal adenomas (66.6% vs 33.3%), and for inflammatory bowel disease (88.9% vs 33.3%). However the enhanced sensitivity of Hemeselect for colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel disease was accompanied by a significant increase in the overall rate of positive reactions (32.8% of patients had a positive Hemeselect reaction compared with 14.8% who had a positive Haemoccult test), and a reduction in specificity (84.1% for Hemeselect vs 96.0% for Haemoccult). Hemeselect is a more sensitive indicator of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic subjects, trials of its use as a screening test for asymptomatic neoplasia appear justified. © 1992 Macmillan Press Ltd.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Thomas, W. M., Hardcastle, J. D., Jackson, J., & Pye, G. (1992). Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: A comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. British Journal of Cancer, 65(4), 218–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1992.125
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.