Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: A comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients

30Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms.Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcinoma (94.0% compared with 58.0%), the greatest difference in sensitivity between the two tests being for rectal cancers. Similarly Hemeselect was more sensitive than Haemoccult for colorectal adenomas (66.6% vs 33.3%), and for inflammatory bowel disease (88.9% vs 33.3%). However the enhanced sensitivity of Hemeselect for colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel disease was accompanied by a significant increase in the overall rate of positive reactions (32.8% of patients had a positive Hemeselect reaction compared with 14.8% who had a positive Haemoccult test), and a reduction in specificity (84.1% for Hemeselect vs 96.0% for Haemoccult). Hemeselect is a more sensitive indicator of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic subjects, trials of its use as a screening test for asymptomatic neoplasia appear justified. © 1992 Macmillan Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, W. M., Hardcastle, J. D., Jackson, J., & Pye, G. (1992). Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: A comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. British Journal of Cancer, 65(4), 218–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1992.125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free