Comparing immersion in collaborative ideation through design conversations, workload and experience

4Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a case study comparing the HIS (Hybrid Ideation Space), a system allowing designers to be physically immersed in their sketches and physical models, and Vyew™, a whiteboard software, in local and remote design collaboration; aiming to see if immersion benefits collaborative ideation. Three methodological tools were used: Design Conversations (Collaborative Ideation Loop "CI-Loop", Collaborative Conversations "CC" and Collaborative Moving "CM"), Workload using NASA TLX and Design Flow for the designers' experience. Local collaboration results appear to have benefited from immersion while remote results were mitigated by participant issues. However, looking deeper into users' experience explains the impactof immersion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorta, T., Kalay, Y., Lesage, A., & Pérez, E. (2011). Comparing immersion in collaborative ideation through design conversations, workload and experience. In Integration Through Computation - Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, ACADIA 2011 (pp. 216–225). https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2011.216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free