Is CT a new research tool for COPD?

11Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is composed of two diseases: chronic bronchitis and emphysema. METHODS AND RESULTS FOR EMPHYSEMA: The essence of emphysema is loss of alveolar walls. Computed tomography (CT), which is based on the attenuation of x-rays, provides precise anatomical information on the density of tissues. Therefore, CT, especially HRCT, is the in vivo method of choice for detection and quantification of emphysema. Reduction of radiation dose has little influence on lung density measurements. This opens up opportunities for CT as a screen for emphysema. Furthermore, repeat scans can be used to follow the progress of emphysema. The depth of inspiration is an important source of variation of lung density measurements, but inspiratory level has no influence on the total weight of the lung derived from CT scans, making it easy to adjust lung densities to a standardised volume such as predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) by the following formula: adjusted lung density = observed lung density x observed TLC/predicted TLC. METHODS AND RESULTS FOR CHRONIC BRONCHITIS: Chronic bronchitis represents the airway component of COPD. During recent years, improved resolution of HRCT with faster scans, smaller detectors and multi-detector-row technology has made it possible to visualise airways down to a range of 2 mm diameter (6th generation), which represents the upper-size limit of the pathophysiologically important 'small airways'. CONCLUSION: In the future, CT may replace pulmonary function measurements (FEV(1)) as the gold standard for assessing the response to treatment in clinical trials of COPD, provided that the lung community does the same painstaking work of standardising and validating CT that it did for spirometry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dirksen, A. (2008). Is CT a new research tool for COPD? The Clinical Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-699X.2008.00088.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free