A Longitudinal Assessment of the Effect of Resident-Centered Care on Quality in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers

9Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether changes in resident-centered care (RCC) over time were associated with changes in quality. Data Sources/Study Setting: Data sources were the Minimum Dataset quality indicators (which consist of measures of both prevalence and incidence of adverse events) and the Artifacts of Culture Change Tool (which measures RCC; FYs 2009–2012) from 130 Veterans Health Administration community living centers. Study Design: A retrospective longitudinal study. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Data were from VA secondary data sources. Principal Findings: The overall relationship between RCC and quality was not statistically significant (p =.22), although there was a weakly significant negative relationship (i.e., increased RCC was associated with poorer quality) in the seven quarters after implementation of an automated version of the Artifacts Tool (p =.08). In facility-specific analyses, there were 15 facilities with a weakly significant (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sullivan, J. L., Shwartz, M., Stolzmann, K., Afable, M. K., & Burgess, J. F. (2018). A Longitudinal Assessment of the Effect of Resident-Centered Care on Quality in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers. Health Services Research, 53(3), 1819–1833. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12688

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free