Relationship of different perceived exertion scales in walking or running with self-selected and imposed intensity

4Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to: (1) compare the Heart Rate (HR) and Rating Perceived Exertion (RPE) in training with self-selected and imposed loads, and (2) associate the OMNI-Walk/Run and Borg scales with self-selected and imposed loads, both on a treadmill. Ten trained men (20.3 ± 2.0 years, 75.6 ± 9.8 kg, 175.1 ± 5.1 cm) participated in a training program with self-selected load (time and speed individually preferred) and another with imposed load (even self-selected time and speed 10% higher). The HR and RPE were measured, every minute of training, by the OMNIWalk/ Run and Borg scales. No significant differences were found in the HR and RPE between training sessions. The correlation between the OMNI-Walk/Run and Borg scales showed a moderate association (r = 0.55) in training with self-selected load and a strong association in imposed load (r = 0.79). In this study, self-selected load induced a suboptimal stimulus to elicit favorable organic adaptations. Moreover, high correlation of OMNI Walk/Run and Borg scales with the imposed load showed that the greater the load of training the best were answers of RPE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dias, M. R. C., Simão, R., MacHado, G. H. R., Furtado, H., Sousa, N. F., Fernandes, H. M., & Saavedra, F. J. F. (2014). Relationship of different perceived exertion scales in walking or running with self-selected and imposed intensity. Journal of Human Kinetics, 43(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2014-0100

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free