Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value? Evidence from the Business Roundtable's challenge

45Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We use the Business Roundtable's challenge to the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC's) 2010 proxy access rule as a natural experiment to measure the value of shareholder proxy access. We find that firms that would have been most vulnerable to proxy access, as measured by institutional ownership and activist institutional ownership, lost value on October 4, 2010, when the SEC unexpectedly announced that it would delay implementation of the rule in response to the Business Roundtable's challenge. We examine intraday returns and find that the loss of value occurred just after the SEC's announcement on October 4. We find similar results for July 22, 2011, when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of the Business Roundtable. These findings are consistent with the view that financial markets placed a positive value on shareholder access, as implemented in the SEC's 2010 rule. © 2013 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becker, B., Bergstresser, D., & Subramanian, G. (2013). Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value? Evidence from the Business Roundtable’s challenge. Journal of Law and Economics, 56(1), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1086/667411

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free