Mixed anxiety and depressive disorder outcomes: Prospective cohort study in primary care

25Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Mixed anxiety and depressive disorder (MADD) is common yet ill-defined, with little known about outcomes. Aims: To determine MADD outcomes over 1 year. Method: We recruited 250 adults attending seven London general practices with mild-moderate distress. Three groups were defined using a diagnostic interview: MADD, other ICD-10 psychiatric diagnosis, no psychiatric diagnosis. We assessed symptoms of distress (General Health Questionnaire-28), quality of life (12-item Short Form Health Survey), general practitioner (GP) diagnosis and consultation rate at baseline, 3 months and 1 year. Results: Two-thirds of participants with MADD had no significant psychological distress at 3 months (61%) or 1 year (69%). However, compared with those with no diagnosis, individuals had twice the risk of significant distress (incidence rate ratio 2.39, 95% CI 1.29-4.42) at 3 months but not 1 year, and persistently lower quality of life (mental health functioning). There was no significant difference in GP consultation rate/diagnosis. Conclusions: The majority with MADD improved, but individuals had an increased risk of significant distress at 3 months and a lower quality of life. As we cannot currently predict those with a poorer prognosis these patients should be actively monitored in primary care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walters, K., Buszewicz, M., Weich, S., & King, M. (2011). Mixed anxiety and depressive disorder outcomes: Prospective cohort study in primary care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 198(6), 472–478. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free