Age should not be a limiting factor in laparoscopic surgery: A prospective multicenter cohort study on quality of life after laparoscopic hysterectomy

3Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was performed on the implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of LH on quality of life (QOL) with respect to age up to 6 months postoperatively. Patients and methods: Women with an indication for LH, either for benign conditions or early-stage low-risk endometrial cancer were included. QOL was measured before and 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery, using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Mean QOL values were compared to an unselected, female, Dutch reference population. A longitudinal linear mixed model was applied to assess changes in QOL over time after LH and to determine if in patients ≥65 years of age QOL scores were different. Results: Data on 116 patients were available for analysis. The median age was 54 years at time of surgery (range 34–83) with an interquartile range of 43–65 years. Six months after LH, all QOL values were higher than before surgery and were equal to or higher than those of the reference population. Older women tend to score higher on QOL preoperatively, and these scores remain high postoperatively. Conclusion: After LH, QOL improves. Older women report higher QOL values preoperatively and QOL is still high 6 months after the operation. Age does not confer a negative impact on QOL following LH and should not be the reason to refrain from laparoscopic surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Briët, J. M., Mourits, M. J. E., van Leeuwen, B. L., van den Heuvel, E. R., Kenkhuis, M. J. A., Arts, H. J. G., & de Bock, G. H. (2018). Age should not be a limiting factor in laparoscopic surgery: A prospective multicenter cohort study on quality of life after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 13, 2517–2526. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S172965

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free