Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement

14Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. Methods CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Scheimpflug, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Per device deviation from the mean CCT value per eye was used to determine which of the devices performed best, compared to the mean value. Results Cirrus OCT yielded the lowest deviation. Deviations of the individual devices from the mean CCT of each eye were (OS/OD) 12.8±5.0/14.9±9.4 μm for Topcon noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), 11.3±5.9/10.6±7.3 μm for Pentacam, 10.7±5.2/10.4±4.8 μm for Spectralis OCT, 6.0±3.9/6.2±4.9 μm for Topcon DRI OCT, 5.1±3.4/5.9±10.3 μm for AngioVue OCT, 4.8±4.1/5.7±4.6 μm for US pachymetry, and 4.2±3.2/5.7±4.6 μm for Cirrus OCT. The maximum differences between US pachymetry and the other devices were very high (up to 120 μm). Conclusion Central corneal thickness may be under- or overestimated due to high interdevice variations. Measuring CCT with one device only may lead to inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations. OCT showed superior results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maloca, P. M., Studer, H. P., Ambrósio, R., Goldblum, D., Rothenbuehler, S., Barthelmes, D., … Hasler, P. W. (2018). Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement. PLoS ONE, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203884

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free