Does cardiology hold pharmacogenetics to an inconsistent standard? A comparison of evidence among recommendations

11Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Current guideline recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing for clopidogrel by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) contradict the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and the US FDA. The AHA/ACC recommends against routine pharmacogenetic testing for clopidogrel because no randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that testing improves patients' outcomes. However the AHA/ACC and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend other pharmacogenetic tests in the absence of randomized controlled trials evidence. Using clopidogrel as a case example, we compared the evidence for other pharmacogenetic tests recommended by the AHA/ACC and NCCN. In patients that received percutaneous coronary intervention, the evidence supporting pharmacogenetic testing for clopidogrel is stronger than other pharmacogenetic tests recommended by the AHA/ACC and NCCN.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luzum, J. A., & Cheung, J. C. (2018, October 1). Does cardiology hold pharmacogenetics to an inconsistent standard? A comparison of evidence among recommendations. Pharmacogenomics. Future Medicine Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2018-0097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free