Neovagina creation methods and their potential impact on subsequent uterus transplantation: a review

30Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Congenital uterovaginal aplasia commonly occurs in Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Various methods of neovagina creation exist, including nonsurgical self-dilation, surgical dilation, and surgical procedures involving skin or intestinal transplants. Subsequent uterus transplantation is necessary to enable pregnancy. We review the main characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of established neovagina creation methods and discuss their suitability regarding subsequent uterus transplantation. Suitability criteria include sufficient vaginal length, absence of previous major intra-abdominal surgery, a natural vaginal axis, and a natural vaginal epithelium. In conclusion, Vecchietti-based laparoscopically assisted neovagina creation provides ideal functional conditions for uterus transplantation. Nonsurgical self-dilation and Wharton–Sheares–George vaginoplasty may also be suitable. Tweetable abstract: This review discusses the main advantages and disadvantages of neovagina creation methods with regard to subsequent uterus transplantation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kölle, A., Taran, F. A., Rall, K., Schöller, D., Wallwiener, D., & Brucker, S. Y. (2019, October 1). Neovagina creation methods and their potential impact on subsequent uterus transplantation: a review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15888

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free