The McGrath series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: A randomized trial in obstetric patients

27Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/aim: Anesthesiologists have encountered various difficulties in securing the airway. Therefore, we compare the intubation times and hemodynamic changes between the McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Materials and methods: A total of 80 obstetric patients were divided into 2 groups, orotracheally intubated with either the McGrath video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope. The intubation times, Cormack-Lehane grade, percentage of glottic opening, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rates were compared among the groups. Results: Intubation time in the McGrath video laryngoscope group was significantly longer than in the Macintosh laryngoscope group (P < 0.01). The percentage of glottic opening was found to be higher in the McGrath video laryngoscope group (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope provides excellent views during orotracheal intubation in obstetric anesthesia with normal airways. © TÜBİTAK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arici, S., Karaman, S., Doǧru, S., Karaman, T., Tapar, H., Özsoy, A. Z., … Süren, M. (2014). The McGrath series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: A randomized trial in obstetric patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 44(3), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1306-71

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free