Performance Analysis of Saccades for Primary and Confirmatory Target Selection

6Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In eye-gaze-based selection, dwell suffers from several issues, e.g., the Midas Touch problem. Here we investigate saccade-based selection techniques as an alternative to dwell. First, we designed a novel user interface (UI) for Actigaze and used it with (goal-crossing) saccades for confirming the selection of small targets (i.e., < 1.5-2°). We compared it with three other variants of Actigaze (with button press, dwell, and target reverse crossing) and two variants of target magnification (with button press and dwell). Magnification-dwell exhibited the most promising performance. For Actigaze, goal-crossing was the fastest option but suffered the most errors. We then evaluated goal-crossing as a primary selection technique for normal-sized targets (≥ 2°) and implemented a novel UI for such interaction. Results revealed that dwell achieved the best performance. Yet, we identified goal-crossing as a good compromise between dwell and button press. Our findings thus identify novel options for gaze-only interaction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mutasim, A., Batmaz, A. U., Hudhud Mughrabi, M., & Stuerzlinger, W. (2022). Performance Analysis of Saccades for Primary and Confirmatory Target Selection. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3562939.3565619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free