Efficiency and tolerability of induction and consolidation therapy with arsenic trioxide/ bortezomib/ascorbic acid/dexamethasone (ABCD) regimen compared to bortezomib/ dexamethasone (BD) regimen in newly diagnosed myeloma patients

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and tolerability of an arsenic trioxide/ bortezomib/ascorbic acid/dexamethasone (ABCD) regimen with efficacy and tolerability of a bortezomib/dexamethasone (BD) regimen in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods: Fifty-seven and sixty-four patients were treated with the ABCD and BD regimens, respectively. Eligible and agreeable patients received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation followed by consolidation. Results: The response rates (above VGPR) were 74.1% and 32.8% in the ABCD-and BDtreated groups, respectively (P = 0.000). Compared to BD regimen, ABCD regimen significantly improved PFS (P = 0.026) and OS (P = 0.000) in newly diagnosed patients. Patients with a high tumor burden, low or standard risk, and without auto-HSCT seemed to especially benefit compared to the same group with BD regimen. ABCD also showed better tolerability with lower bone marrow suppression (P = 0.026). Furthermore, complete response or near CR after induction therapy was a good prognostic factor for ABCDassociated OS and PFS. Conclusion: ABCD is an effective and tolerable regimen compared with BD regimen in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. ABCD regimen could be an economical, effective, and tolerable choice in low-and standard-risk patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qian, W., Wang, L., Li, P., Hu, Y., Wang, Q., Yi, K., … Xie, Y. (2020). Efficiency and tolerability of induction and consolidation therapy with arsenic trioxide/ bortezomib/ascorbic acid/dexamethasone (ABCD) regimen compared to bortezomib/ dexamethasone (BD) regimen in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Cancer Management and Research, 12, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S212455

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free