Expanding ethics review processes to include community-level protections: A case study from Flint, Michigan

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text
This PDF is freely available from an open access repository. It may not have been peer-reviewed.

Abstract

As the Flint community endeavors to recover and move forward in the aftermath of the Flint water crisis, distrust of scientific and governmental authorities must be overcome. Future community engagement in research will require community-level protections ensuring that no further harm is done to the community. A community ethics review explores risks and benefits and complements institutional review board (IRB) review. Using the case of Flint, I describe how community-level ethical protections can reestablish a community's trust. All IRBs reviewing protocols that include risk to communities and not merely individual participants should consider how community members are engaged in the proposed research and identify and respond to questions and domains of concern from community members.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Key, K. D. (2017). Expanding ethics review processes to include community-level protections: A case study from Flint, Michigan. AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(10), 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.10.ecas3-1710

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free