Prioritization not rationing in cancer care

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Conditions of scarcity impact healthcare services for cancer patients. This is the unpleasant reality for nations, local governments, hospitals, and even individual doctors. This means that medical services judged by objective standards as potentially effective by medical professionals are limited because of financial or access scarcity. With this situation of scarcity as premise, one must raise the ethical question of how to deal with scarcity while respecting fundamental principles of human dignity and human rights. This chapter focuses on the German healthcare context where dignity and rights form the basis and framework for medical ethics. Accordingly, in Germany, rationing medical services for life-threatening diseases has been traditionally and appropriately criticized and prohibited. Granting a situation of scarcity, however, some prioritization becomes increasingly necessary. Thus, there is present need for careful ethical analysis of non-emergency regulatory prioritization principles and protocols. Above all, analysis and conclusions must preserve and foster society’s deepest moral commitments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knoepffler, N., Zerth, J., & O’Malley, M. (2019). Prioritization not rationing in cancer care. In Recent Results in Cancer Research (Vol. 213, pp. 189–205). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01207-6_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free