Measuring the hidden economy: Implications for econometric modelling

162Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper I support using econometric techniques to measure the size of the hidden (underground) economy, because such information is important for the construction of certain economic models, and for empirical policy analysis. Generally, detailed information on the output of the hidden economy is unavailable. Even where careful measures of the underground economy have been constructed, usually these data are available only periodically. Important exceptions include the classic results of Tanzi (1983) for the United States, and Bhattacharyya's (1990) series for the United Kingdom. In the case of the New Zealand economy, a time-series of data on the hidden economy has been generated recently (Giles, 1997a). This provides the unusual opportunity to undertake econometric modelling in a way which takes account of such activity formally. Moreover, we can examine the policy implications arising from the linkages between hidden output and various measured economic aggregates. This is an area that has been largely neglected until now.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giles, D. E. A. (1999). Measuring the hidden economy: Implications for econometric modelling. Economic Journal, 109(456), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00440

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free