Anticommons, the Coase theorem and the problem of bundling inefficiency

3Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Coase theorem is most often formulated in terms of bilateral monopoly, for instance between a polluting factory and an affected neighbour. Instead, we introduce multiple affected neighbours and the concept of anticommons, in which autonomous actors with separate yet necessarily complementary inputs each has the right to deny but not to permit use. Once we posit multiple owners possessing complementary rights, strategically maximizing against each other as well as against the actor who wishes to purchase a portion of that right, the outcome is neither efficient nor invariant. Our finding, based on non-cooperative game theory, is sustained even under the restrictive Coase assumptions regarding complete information, perfect rationality, and zero transaction costs. The implication is that suboptimal bundling agreements in cases of multiple stakeholders is not the mere product of market imperfection, but instead is a systematic result.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Major, I., King, R. F., & Marian, C. G. (2016). Anticommons, the Coase theorem and the problem of bundling inefficiency. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.614

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free