Analysis of the Static and Dynamic Imbibition Effect of Surfactants and the Relative Mechanism in Low-Permeability Reservoirs

24Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Establishing an effective displacement system for conventional water flooding development in low-permeability reservoirs is difficult, with generally low liquid and oil production and a worse water flooding effect. Imbibition oil recovery technology has received increasing attention from oil development workers because of its simple operation, low cost, and good oil increase effect. To explore the method and mechanism to further improve the effect of imbibition oil recovery, we study the imbibition and oil recovery effect and its influencing factors in a low-permeability reservoir in the Dagang Oilfield based on evaluation indexes of the adhesion work reduction factor, ratio of capillary force to gravity NB-1, regression analysis of the recovery rate of imbibition, proportional relationship with spontaneous imbibition, and dynamic imbibition effect in crack rocks. Results show that reducing the interfacial tension of the surfactant on the imbibition process has a dual effect. The selection of the surfactant for fractured tight reservoirs should not excessively pursue ultralow interfacial tension, and it should consider the surface wettability environment favorable for imbibition to ensure that a sufficient driving force can be provided. In the initial imbibition stage, the capillary force is large, the velocity of water imbibition in pores is fast, and the oil recovery rate is high; the holding time of the imbibition process is important to imbibition recovery. With the increase in imbibition time, the capillary force weakens, and the imbibition speed decreases to zero. With the increase in injection volume, reservoir pressure, pressure holding time, and imbibition cycles, the oil recovery increases, but the amplification of oil recovery decreases. From the technical and economic viewpoints, the optimal slug size, throughput cycle, and pressure holding time of the target reservoir are recommended as follows: 0.5 PV,three3 rounds, and greater than 96 h, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tian, F., Zhao, Y., Yan, Y., Gou, X., Shi, L., Qin, F., … Lu, X. (2020). Analysis of the Static and Dynamic Imbibition Effect of Surfactants and the Relative Mechanism in Low-Permeability Reservoirs. ACS Omega, 5(28), 17442–17449. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01888

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free