Internal robotics

73Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Robotics can contribute significantly to our understanding of the behaviour of organisms because of the emphasis on the role of the body and its physical interactions with the external environment in determining the organism's behaviour. However, behaviour is the result of the interactions of an organism's nervous system with both the external environment and the internal environment, i.e. with what lies within the organism's body. While robotics has concentrated so far on the first type of interactions (external robotics), to understand the behaviour of organisms more adequately we also need to reproduce in robots the inside of the body of organisms and to study the interactions of the robot's control system with what is inside the body (internal robotics). In this paper, seven differences between the two types of interactions are discussed and some examples of internal robotics are briefly described: robots that evolve a biological clock that allows them to look for food during the day and to rest at night; robots that evolve a pain signal associated with some damage in their body that allows the robot to stop moving when ill in order to recover more quickly from the bodily damage; and robots that can be hungry and/or thirsty and respond adaptively or maladaptively to conflicts between these two motivations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parisi, D. (2004). Internal robotics. Connection Science, 16(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540090412331314768

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free