Pancasila dalam Pusaran Diskursus Liberalisme versus Komunitarisme

  • Madung O
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract: This paper attempts to show that a democratic order is not built onthe procedural ethics as assumed by liberals, but it is required a substantiveethical foundation. The reason is the democratic system is not contained ofatomistic individuals without social relations. A democratic process always movesin a society characterized by social relations and the various formation pro-cesses of complex communities. Democracy is built on formal yet fragilecollective identity. In the context of Indonesia, Pancasila is an expression of thecollective identity. As a collective identity, Pancasila has no ends and always inthe process of being and find themselves in a new way. At the end of thepaper, two methods; deliberative and agonistic democracy method are pre-sented. These methods are offered by contemporary political philosophy inresolving conflicts of value in the middle of pluralism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Madung, O. G. (2016). Pancasila dalam Pusaran Diskursus Liberalisme versus Komunitarisme. Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora, 13(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v13i2.768

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free