Ultrasound-enhanced water electrolysis for hydrogen production: Mechanisms, metrology and energy metrics

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ultrasound intensifies hydrogen production in water electrolysis cells by thinning boundary layers, accelerating bubble detachment, and, in tuned windows, modulating cavitation chemistry, yet cross-study claims remain difficult to compare. Focusing on ultrasound-enhanced water electrolysis (sono-electrolysis), this review aligns reporting with IEC 61161 (radiation-force acoustic power) and IEC 62127-2:2025 (hydrophone calibration); requires delivered acoustic intensity at the electrode, Idel / W·cm⁻², with stated traceability; pairs isothermal control with uncertainty budgets; and benchmarks performance using Δ-metrics: Δj (current-density gain at fixed cell voltage), Δη (cell voltage/overpotential reduction at fixed current density) and ΔHPR (hydrogen production rate gain at matched electrical input), together with specific energy consumption (SEC, kWh·kg⁻¹ H₂). A window-based synthesis indicates that, under isothermal operation, 20 to 40 kHz with delivered intensity ≈0.2 to 1.0 W·cm⁻² reproducibly yields Δj ≈ 15 to 30 %, Δη ≈ 40 to 120 mV, ΔHPR ≈ 10 to 30 %, and net SEC improvements of ~8 to 12 % when auxiliary loads are included, whereas at higher dose (Idel ≈ 1.0 to 1.6 W·cm⁻²) non-uniform fields, cloud shielding, and heating can saturate or reverse benefits. To prevent metric conflation, hybrid sono-hydrogen routes are reviewed separately. The review concludes by proposing a minimum reporting set-frequency, waveform/duty and pulse repetition frequency, Idel (traceability/uncertainty), geometry/stand-off, electrolyte and dissolved gas, bulk temperature and runtime, gas metrology with temperature/pressure corrections, SEC boundaries and replicates/statistics, and by outlining priorities for operando cavitation-electrochemistry co-registration, geometry/void-fraction-aware scale-up, and durability under combined fields, to support reproducible, energy-accounted, and comparable studies across laboratories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chenhongwen, Z., Teoh, Y. H., How, H. G., Idroas, M. Y., & Le, T. D. (2026, February 23). Ultrasound-enhanced water electrolysis for hydrogen production: Mechanisms, metrology and energy metrics. Journal of Electrochemical Science and Engineering. International Association of Physical Chemists. https://doi.org/10.5599/jese.3045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free