Structural and electronic properties of a-, ß-, ?-, and 6,6,18-graphdiyne sheets and nanotubes

21Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

a-, ß-, ?- and 6,6,18-graphdiyne (GDYs) sheets, as well as the corresponding nanotubes (GDYNTs) are investigated systematically by using the self-consistent-field crystal orbital method. The calculations show that the GDYs and GDYNTs with different structures have different electronic properties. The a-GDY sheet is a conductor, while 2D ß-, ?- and 6,6,18-GDYs are semiconductors. The carrier mobilities of ß- and ?-GDY sheets in different directions are almost the same, indicating the isotropic transport characteristics. In addition, the electron mobility is in the order of 106cm2V-1s-1and it is two orders of magnitude larger than the hole mobility of 2D ?-GDY. However, a- and 6,6,18-GDY sheets have anisotropic mobilities, which are different along different directions. For the 1D tubes, the order of stability is ?-GDYNTs > 6,6,18-GDYNTs > ß-GDYNTs > a-GDYNTs and is independent of the tube chirality and size. ß- and ?-GDYNTs as well as zigzag a- and 6,6,18-GDYNTs are semiconductors with direct bandgaps, while armchair a-GDYNTs are metals, and armchair 6,6,18-GDYNTs change from semiconductors to metals with increasing tube size. The armchair ß- and ?-GDYNTs are more favourable to transport holes, while the corresponding zigzag tubes prefer to transport electrons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, L., Qiao, W., Bai, H., & Huang, Y. (2020). Structural and electronic properties of a-, ß-, ?-, and 6,6,18-graphdiyne sheets and nanotubes. RSC Advances, 10(28), 16709–16717. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra01777a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free