Can we reliably reconstruct the mid-Pliocene Warm Period with sparse data and uncertain models?

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a reconstruction of the surface climate of the mid-Pliocene Warm Period (mPWP), specifically Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) KM5c or 3.205 Ma. We combine the ensemble of climate model simulations, which contributed to the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP), with compilations of proxy data analyses of sea surface temperature (SST). The different data sets we considered are all sparse with high uncertainty, and the best estimate of annual global mean surface air temperature (SAT) anomaly varies from 2.1 up to 4.8 °C depending on the data source. We argue that the latest PlioVAR analysis of alkenone data is likely more reliable than other data sets we consider, and using this data set yields an SAT anomaly of 3.9±1.1 °C, with a value of 2.8±0.9 °C for SST (all uncertainties are quoted at 1 standard deviation). However, depending on the application, it may be advisable to consider the broader range arising from the various data sets to account for structural uncertainty. The regional-scale information in the reconstruction may not be reliable as it is largely based on the patterns simulated by the models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Annan, J. D., Hargreaves, J. C., Mauritsen, T., McClymont, E., & Ho, S. L. (2024). Can we reliably reconstruct the mid-Pliocene Warm Period with sparse data and uncertain models? Climate of the Past, 20(9), 1989–1999. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1989-2024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free