Abstract
Objectives: To compare success rates between the sub-periosteal prepared (SPP) muco-periosteal flap and the epi-periosteal prepared (EPP) mucosa flap and the feasibility of alveoplasty after surgical tooth extractions in patients undergoing/after antiresorptive treatment. Subjects: Patients with an indication for preventive tooth extraction undergoing/after antiresorptive treatment were enrolled over a 24-month period in a parallel-group randomized clinical pilot trial and randomly assigned for primary wound closure to either the SPP or the EPP group. The primary outcome was treatment failure 8 weeks after surgery. To assess the feasibility of alveoplasty, necrotic bone changes at the time point of tooth extraction were evaluated. Results: One hundred and sixty patients were randomized to the SSP (n = 82) or the EPP (n = 78) group. One hundred and fifty-seven patients met the primary endpoint 8 weeks after surgery with five treatment failures for the SPP group (6.3%) and 18 (23.4%) for the EPP group (p =.004). A significant relationship (p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ristow, O., Rückschloß, T., Moratin, J., Müller, M., Kühle, R., Dominik, H., … Freudlsperger, C. (2021). Wound closure and alveoplasty after preventive tooth extractions in patients with antiresorptive intake—A randomized pilot trial. Oral Diseases, 27(3), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13556
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.