Use of cognitive therapy for relapse prevention in chronic depression: Cost-effectiveness study

98Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of data on the cost-effectiveness of relapse prevention in depression. Method: A total of 158 subjects with partially remitted major depression despite adequate clinical treatment were randomly allocated to cognitive therapy in addition to antidepressants and clinical management v. antidepressants and clinical management alone. Relapse rates and health care resource utitisation were measured prospectively over 17 months. Results: Cumulative relapse rates in the cognitive therapy group were significantly lower than in the control group (29% v. 47%). The incremental cost incurred in subjects receiving cognitive therapy over 17 months (£779; 95% CI £387-£1170) was significantly lower than the overall mean costs of cognitive therapy (£1164; 95% CI £1084-£1244). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranged from £4328 to £5027 per additional relapse prevented. Conclusions: In individuals with depressive symptoms that are resistant to standard treatment, adjunctive cognitive therapy is more costly but more effective than intensive clinical treatment alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scott, J., Palmer, S., Paykel, E., Teasdale, J., & Hayhurst, H. (2003). Use of cognitive therapy for relapse prevention in chronic depression: Cost-effectiveness study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182(MAR.), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.182.3.221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free