On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals

29Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the complexity of several recently proposed methods for updating or revising propositional knowledge bases. In particular, we derive complexity results for the following problem: given a knowledge base T, an update p, and a formula q, decide whether q is derivable from Tp, the updated (or revised) knowledge base. This problem amounts to evaluating the counterfactual p>q over T. Besides the general case, also subcases are considered, in particular where T is a conjunction of Horn clauses, or where the size of p is bounded by a constant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eiter, T., & Gottlob, G. (1992). On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (pp. 261–273). Publ by ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/137097.137886

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free