Hand Hygiene Messaging Design in the Workplace: Views From the Workforce—Introduction

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: The study aimed to (1) discover workers’ attitudes toward the use of novel video screens to improve hand sanitization in the workplace and (2) discover what workers’ preferences are for hand hygiene (HH) messaging style and tone and reasons for their preferences. Background: Practicing good HH in non-medical office settings is vital to curb the spread of a range of common and infectious diseases. Despite this, workers are rarely consulting in the construction of HH messages. The qualitative views of users can provide us with the “why” rather than the “what” and can highlight areas of cynicism, concern and overall attitudes to HH. Methods: A survey was completed by 520 UK workers concerning attitudes and views toward HH messaging and the use of a video-based hand sanitizer unit. Analysis consisted of both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Workers were skeptical toward the use of digital technologies within HH interventions, and there were misgivings about the role that video could play. Results demonstrated a strong preference for positive and supportive messages. Educational and trustworthy qualities were well rated. Messages that emphasized surveillance, previously successful in a clinical setting, or guilt, were not well received. Visual approaches that utilized serious illustration were valued. Conclusion: This study highlights how consulting workers before the design of HH initiatives is important in guiding the design process. The resultant user-centered criteria promotes the use of positive, motivational, thought-provoking, surprising, and visual approaches to HH messaging.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stones, C., Ai, W., Rutter, S., & Madden, A. (2024). Hand Hygiene Messaging Design in the Workplace: Views From the Workforce—Introduction. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 17(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867231195646

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free